Tribulation Period Essay Example for Free

Tribulation Period Essay Tribulation is a period of time when God will bring on his judgment to the world. According to the prophecies of the Book of Revelation and the Book of Daniel, it will consist of 7 years. This 7 year period is divided into two. The first half is known as the period of Great Sorrow and the next half is known as the Great Tribulation. In the beginning of the first half, the church will be saved from the wrath of God by the event known as the Rapture. In this event, Jesus will descend from heaven and deliver all Christians to the Lord. For those who will be born and become Christians after the Rapture will live through the tribulation period.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The great tribulation will take place when the Antichrist is announced in the temple. The earth will then suffer three wraths, Wrath of the Lamb, Wrath of the Satan and Wrath of the Father. Wrath of the Lamb refers to the wrath of the Christian’s savior Jesus Christ. According to prophecies, rocks from the mountains will befall on man as they cry. Right after the Wrath of the Lamb, the earth will suffer the Wrath of the Satan after he is stripped off with his access on the throne of God. Satan will be sent to the earth after being barred in the heavens. Basing on the interpretation of Revelation 12:7-12, Satan and his angels will be cast into the world tempting Christians to sell their souls. Finally, the world will taste the Wrath of the Father.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   During the aforementioned period, the earth will suffer extreme confusion for there will reign the church of the antichrist. There will be a false messiah who will deceive people and only those who have strong faith who will be able to distinguish the false messiah with the real messiah. In addition, Satan and his angels will be lurking on earth and mingling with people influencing them to exchange their souls with his angels promising salvation.

Sweat :: essays research papers

Sweat It is easy to see why a person would find "Sweat" an offensive story. Many who read this story will find that the style in which it is written to be degrading to the African American race. However, this assumption has little backing. Zora Hurston is clearly relaying a story that tells of her time. To say "Sweat" is stereotypical is to deny the fact that this is the way things were at one time. For a person to acknowledge the way things were is to merely recall history. Why should a race be ashamed of their history? They would better their own values by taking this story for what it is worth. Not only does it tell of their ancestors way of life, but it shows how things have changed for the better. If one could not write stories about their experiences in the past the public would be unknowing of its culture and heritage. Hurston even used reference to Jewish people in this story. They also were slaves and were faced with over four hundred years of hardships and inequalities. It has not been known for the people of the Jewish faith to be insulted by the Bible which tells their stories. In fact, they use it as a way of life. It serves as a learning tool that proved how strong they were and how much suffering they had to endure. When they are faced with problems they relate back to stories, just as this, to find that strength once again. Mrs. Hurston, being a African American herself, should have the right to tell a story of her heritage without being persecuted. The fact that that is how African Americans spoke during that time should not be cause for embarrassment. It is just a fact of how things were. When relating a story from a certain time period, it should be written in the dialect used at that time. The people who find this story demeaning are obviously choosing to not believe this is how things were. If you change the facts, you change the history. People of all nationalities have parts of their heritage that they would rather not admit to, but a mistake made should be noted and then changed if possible. It should not be forgotten due to its unpleasantness. The more African Americans are ignored for their differences, the more they have to set themselves apart from the "typical" white American. For example, black people were given equal rights and equal opportunities in the working world with affirmative action. These things were obtained through the request

Cannibalism In The Cars Autosaved

The men, trying to hold on to human values and not succumb to their instincts, fail ascribable as they attempted to remove their guilt Of eating each other by justifying it through â€Å"Roberts Rules of Order. † The cannibalism may seem an extreme symbol to represent what is often the product of the government's legislative actions, there is little arguing that acts and laws have been passed that have been detrimental to the citizens of this nation, such as the black codes and Jim Crow laws.Though the symbolic nature of the story may be hyperbolic, Twain vividly personifies the United States' dubious legislative process by focusing on the demutualization of the subjects for which it was reared by illustrating selfishness, a lack of focus on the greater cause, and the inability to consider ulterior solutions. It is important to note the context of Twain's work. This piece was written in 1868 during the era of Reconstruction, following the Civil War.The government, at the time, was trying to reestablish the viability of the South, but was failing, which drew the focus away from the true needs required to reconstruct the South rather to government proceedings. At the beginning of Reconstruction, disagreement between the Radical Republicans and the more moderate Republicans such s Lincoln and Johnson led to the swift reconstruction of the South being thwarted. With the focus drawn away from the South, Black Codes, corrupt sharecropping, and organizations like the UK Klux Klan were established right under the government's nose.Twain had witnessed the tragic results of selfishness, lack of focus, and inability to consider workable solutions. â€Å"Cannibalism in Cars† offers numerous examples throughout that portray the self-serving paradigm from which the stranded passengers operate. â€Å"Gentleman: It cannot be delayed longer! The time is at hand! We must determine which of us shall die to furnish food for the rest! (Twain, 4). â€Å"Gentleman-?I nominate the Rev. James Sawyer of Tennessee. † (Twain, 4).On the seventh day of sitting in the cars without food, these were the initial statements. Quite obviously the passengers, or parliamentarians-to-be, as it were, faced imminent starvation, which is why they turned to cannibalism. Meltzer 2 Although everyone was in agreement that they needed sustenance for survival, no one seemed particularly ready to offer themselves as the main course. As was the case then and is the case now, legislatures are known to place self-preservation above all else.For example, â€Å"pork barrel† spending as long been a tool to assure votes as tax dollars are funneled to specific districts despite much greater needs elsewhere. Additionally, gerrymandering, or purposefully shaping voting districts to gift wrap favorable election results for a specific party, is a partisan maneuver that ignores fair representation for the benefit of certain politicians. Examples of politicians choosing se lf over the greater good are innumerable, thus though Twain's example may be grotesque, it is almost believable, and eloquently illustrates his point.The greater cause for the men on the train was survival. However, the focus would teeter be;en sun. ‘vial and superfluous rules of order. Mr.. Sander, one of the many stranded passengers, found the proceedings to be flawed and said â€Å"Gentleman-?I protest earnestly against these proceedings. They are, in every way, irregular and unbecoming. Must beg to move that they be dropped at once, and that we elect a chairman of the meeting and proper officers to assist him, and then we can go on with the business before us understandingly. (Twain 5). Additionally, Mr.. Bell Of Iowa made it abundantly clear that the focus was on surviving and not the proceedings through his comments. Twain creatively paints a portrait of a group attempting to solve a problem, yet allowing the process and partisanship of politics to intervene. Meltzer Ra ther than work together as a unit to find an alternate solution to a highly complex and difficult situation, the passengers considered only the indignity of eating each other.Though it could be argued that there could have been much less horrid conclusion, sans devouring human flesh, the discussion only centered around one potential conclusion based largely on the testimony of the conductor, who had assured that there was no path to lavational beyond the track. To eat a man that is dead is considered repulsive, but to kill a man then eat him for your own survival is inhuman. The parliamentarians took the conductors word as truth and never gave another thought to venturing out in the snow to find civilization.Once the decision was made that the conductor's word was to be taken as truth, the act of cannibalism was a forgone conclusion, and debate shifted exclusively to determining the process by which the unfortunates should be chosen. Twain was attempting to mirror the faulty logic o ften found in the halls of Congress herein those who have been given the responsibility to govern, fail to fully vet complex issues in order to find the most desirable outcome.Unfortunately, for those who â€Å"won† the vote, consideration given any other method for salvation was quickly dismissed on the basis of one opinion. During the time Of Reconstruction, the United States' government endured one it's more dark periods with the Johnson presidency being an unmitigated failure because of his leniency, Ulysses S. Grant's administration is historically known to have been wrought with corruption, while the government and entry, as a whole, was divided over the management of the South leading to strife among citizen's nationwide.Mark Twain brilliantly and deceptively shares his opinion of the government through his satire. The people on the train tried to construct a form of government to justly, in their mind, decide the next meal. However, constant distraction with disagreem ent over proceedings led to a failure to focus on the main purpose for which the quorum was established. Furthermore, selfish desires impacted the participant's decision, a practice common today in our houses of government.

Hannah Wilke The Youngest Child Of Jewish Parents, Selma...

Hannah Wilke Hannah Randolph College of Saint Mary Abstract Hannah Wilke was born Arlene Hannah Butter in New York City on March 7, 1940. She was the youngest child of Jewish parents, Selma and Emanuel Butter. Hannah and her older sister Marsha, born Marsie Scharlatt, both attended public school in Queens, and in 1957, Hannah graduated from Great Neck High School. She then attended Stella Elkins Tyler School of Fine Art at Temple University in Philadelphia until 1962 when she graduated and received a Bachelor of Fine Arts as well as a teaching certificate. Shortly after graduating, Hannah began teaching at Plymouth-Whitemarsh High School in Pennsylvania from 1962 to 1965, and from 1965 to 1970, she taught at White Plains†¦show more content†¦One way she transformed the negative into positive was constructing her sculptures out of disposable objects, such as lint. Her work was also have said to recall minimalism because she would display this work, usually, in an organized and repetitive manner. At this time in Hannah’s life, s he was gaining a lot of momentum in the art world. Subsequently, her work was included in the â€Å"American Women Artists† exhibition in 1972 at the Kunsthaus in Berlin and the Documenta V in Kassel, West Germany (Scharlatt, M., Scharlatt, E., Scharlatt, D., Scharlatt, A.). Her notable art was praised by many feminist publication groups, and in 1974, she was invited to join the â€Å"Anonymous Was a Woman† exhibition as well as â€Å"Art: A Woman’s Sensibility† exhibition held by the Feminist Art Program at the California Institute of the Arts (Scharlatt, M., Scharlatt, E., Scharlatt, D., Scharlatt, A.). In the 1970s, Hannah began using her body as a canvas for performance pieces. She called this her â€Å"performalist self-portraits,† (Smith, 1993) and they were documented by either video or by photographs. These particular performances, according to Hannah â€Å"confront erotic stereotypes by calling attention to and making ironic the conventional gestures, poses, and attributes of the female body† (Hannah Wilke Collection, 2015). In 1974, Hannah began working on S.O.S. or Starification Object Series, a fifty self-portrait installation,